BreakPoint: Questioning Jesus’ Existence

An Eastertime Media Tradition

Ah, springtime. Flowers blooming, birds singing, and articles questioning the historicity of Jesus hitting the newsstands.

Insurance company Geico has done a lot of funny commercials, but our editor at BreakPoint has a favorite. A group of teenagers are running through a dark forest being chased by a killer. After debating whether to hide in the basement, the attic or make a quick getaway in the nearby running car, they decide to hide behind dozens of chainsaws dangling from a barn door.

“When you’re in a horror movie, you make poor decisions,” says the narrator. “It’s what you do.” And this week I found myself paraphrasing: “When you’re CNN, you publish annual articles suggesting Jesus never existed. It’s what you do.”

Every year around March and December, this and other news outlets exhume the long-dead thesis that the New Testament is based on a mythological figure, not a Man who really lived, died, and rose from the grave two-thousand years ago. This year, CNN even republished an article from 2012 at In the piece, entitled, “Decoding Jesus: Separating Man from Myth,” John Blake suggests that Christ’s historical existence is an open question. CNN featured it at the top of their homepage as part of the push for their new series, “Finding Jesus: Faith, Fact, Forgery.”

Blake quotes the likes of Timothy Freke, author of “Jesus Mysteries” and former Baptist pastor Robert Price, author of “Deconstructing Jesus,” who both claim that the Gospels are forgeries or misunderstood allegories, and that the story of Jesus was copied from legends about pagan deities.

“In the age of the Internet and self-publishing,” writes Blake, “these arguments have gained enough traction that some of the world’s leading New Testament scholars feel compelled to publicly take them on.”

Now let me be clear: This is the very definition of fake news: No credible historian believes Jesus is a myth. Even among skeptics of religion, that theory has been abandoned. None other than Bart Ehrman, the agnostic biblical scholar and fierce critic of the New Testament, calls Jesus-deniers Internet conspiracy theorists trying to sell books, and compares them to Holocaust-deniers.

Dominic Crossan, another scholar who would never pass for an evangelical apologist, says he’s “certain” that Christ existed, and chalks up alternative theories to disdain for the Prince of Peace. Keep in mind, neither Ehrman or Crosson would affirm anything historically Christian, such as that Jesus was not just a man but God—that He performed miracles, died for the sins of the world, and rose from the dead for our justification. But if anything, this fact makes their agreement on His existence even more powerful, not less.

On this issue, they represent the broad consensus among scholars that Christianity began with the life and death of a real and extraordinary Man. Of course, we Christians don’t believe that’s all there was to it. But when our neighbors tell us over the backyard fence that they’ve watched a documentary or read an article claiming Jesus is a myth, we have to be able to respond gently but confidently.

Even ancient writers hostile to Christianity like Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger, confirm the existence of a Man from Nazareth who preached throughout Galilee and Judea, ran afoul of the authorities, was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and sparked what would eventually become the world’s largest religion.

And let’s not forget the New Testament itself, manuscript fragments of which date to the early second century. Ravi Zacharias, who’s speaking at our Wilberforce Weekend in May, points out that the evidence for the life and words of Jesus is stronger than the evidence for Plato. Classicist Michael Grant sums it up best when he writes that “we can no more reject Jesus’ existence than we can reject the existence of a mass of pagan personages whose reality as historical figures is never questioned.”

Look, though many scholars who affirm Jesus’ existence still reject the supernatural claims that make Him worthy of our worship, one thing is certain: Headlines do not equal history. And serious media should stop giving air-time and credibility to Jesus-deniers.


Further Reading and Information

Questioning Jesus’ Existence: An Eastertime Media Tradition

Even scholarly non-believers, as John has mentioned, recognize the historicity of Jesus. So should serious media. To get equipped to present the truth of Christ and His resurrection, check out the resources linked below.


Find a BreakPoint radio station in your area–Click here.

Comment Policy: Commenters are welcome to argue all points of view, but they are asked to do it civilly and respectfully. Comments that call names, insult other people or groups, use profanity or obscenity, repeat the same points over and over, or make personal remarks about other commenters will be deleted. After multiple infractions, commenters may be banned.

  • Regis Nicoll

    This and other evidences for the existence and essence of Jesus are discussed in my book, “Why There Is a God and Why It Matters”

    • Gary Giardina

      I suggest a new approach and it involves not the words belief or not .It involves the words witness or not.If you choose witness than you’re afforded information that reveals the soul of the believer.The information is vast yet is invariable depending on the Internet’s moods.Obviously God provides the litmus and it includes those who won’t even witness modern witnesses and occurances that they debate being fact or not.The inspired and the uninspired.Trust the inspired and Yeshua’s Ministry becomes clear.Utilize the Bible and the Internet.Take care and God bless the blessed!Absolutely no twsited parallels!Absolutely straight forward!Gary V. Giardina!This sent 1:59 P.M. March 19th. 2017.

  • Eddie_in_Ky

    Check with Josh McDowell on Bible antiquities. I believe the oldest NT Manuscripts date a lot closer to Jesus than the 2nd century.

  • Wesley Vaughn

    Bart Ehrman is a Wheaton College and Princeton Theological Seminary graduate who for some reason turned away from his faith.

    • Robert Cremer

      I believe Bart lost his faith because he was a hardnosed fundamentalist that demanded in your-face-proof. We only have great (and growing) evidence for God, but that was not enough for Bart. So now he is a fundamentalist atheist. I have seen Bart debate Christian scholars twice. Bart is a great debater and I wrote down all his arguments and then checked them out. Bart is 100% wrong! I expect he knows that, but he makes a lot of money from his anti-Christian books. But that won’t help him when he dies.

  • Common Ground

    …Bill Maher has a blog and YOU TUBE documentary (Religulous!), that claims Jesus Christ NEVER existed!……….for the caring Christians, why no complaints?

  • Brett

    Does not JESUS Himself prophetically say – When the SON of Man comes shall HE find faith { belief in HIM } on the earth Luke 18 : 8 ……….It’s another prophecy being fullfilled !

  • Common Ground

    …Bill Maher (tv host), has a blog and YOU TUBE documentary, “Religulous!”, that states that Jesus Christ NEVER existed!… this satire or not, and why don’t Christians not protest?