The Point: Dan Brown Gets Corrected

Could science disprove God? For the Colson Center, I’m John Stonestreet with The Point.

Dan Brown, author of “The Da Vinci Code,” made a bold claim in his most recent novel, “Origin” via a fictional version of a real-life MIT physicist, Jeremy England. England, in the book, claims to have discovered a principle that guides the origin and evolution of life and therefore makes God obsolete.

Unfortunately for Brown, the real-life Jeremy England just wrote in the Wall Street Journal that his real-life research does no such thing.

“The language of physics can be extremely useful in talking about the world,” he writes, “but it can never address everything that needs to be said about human life…I’m disappointed in my fictional self for being so blithely uninterested in what lies beyond the narrow confines of his technical field.”

The real Jeremy England believes God is not only real but is behind the physical processes he observes in the lab. You see, the idea that learning more effects could undermine the need for a First Cause is the stuff of fiction.


Dan Brown Can’t Cite Me to Disprove God
  • Jeremy England | Wall Street Journal | October 12, 2017

Comment Policy: Commenters are welcome to argue all points of view, but they are asked to do it civilly and respectfully. Comments that call names, insult other people or groups, use profanity or obscenity, repeat the same points over and over, or make personal remarks about other commenters will be deleted. After multiple infractions, commenters may be banned.