Banner
BP_blog
Three Generations of Eugenics

Sterilizing California Prisoners



Improve the human race by eliminating the weak. That’s a key tenet of eugenics -- a philosophy that is alive and well right here in the good ol’ U.S. of A.

Listen Now | Download


Eric Metaxas

The early 20th century saw hundreds of thousands of so-called “defective” Americans forcibly sterilized in the name of “improving” the human race. In one of the darkest chapters in its history, the Supreme Court sanctioned the process in Buck v. Bell, declaring that “three generations of imbeciles is enough.” Some people would say three generations of imbeciles on the Court is enough; of course, I would never say that.

Not surprisingly, the people deemed “imbeciles” were nothing of the kind. They were simply the most vulnerable people in their communities.

Thankfully, we’ve learned our lessons, and nothing like that can ever happen again. Right? Wrong!

According to a shocking new report from the Center for Investigative Reporting, between 2006 and 2010, “doctors under contract with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation sterilized nearly 150 female inmates” without the approval of top medical officials in Sacramento as state law requires.

The reason for these restrictions should be obvious: the possibility of coercion and manipulation.

According to the report, that’s what happened at the California Institution for Women and Valley State Prison for Women.

According to former inmates and prisoner advocates, prison medical staff targeted those they deemed most likely to re-offend.

Targeted prisoners were pressured to have tubal ligations. As one former inmate told the Center, “As soon as he found out that I had five kids, he suggested that I look into getting it done . . . He made me feel like a bad mother if I didn’t do it.”

While some of the medical staff justified the sterilizations as “empowering” inmates, this claim is belied by the fact that they never sought the required state approval. If the act is so noble, why hide it?

A more plausible explanation was offered by the man who performed many of the sterilizations, Dr. James Heinrich: He told the Center that the money spent on the surgeries was small “compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children.”

For those of us familiar with the history of forced sterilization, both in the U.S. and abroad, it’s déjà vu all over again. This violation of human dignity may have lacked the brutality of the Nazis’ attempts at so-called “racial hygiene,but then again, what Chuck Colson once called America’s “apple pie eugenics” was just as efficient in its war against the weak as the Nazi efforts it inspired.

That’s right, inspired. As Edwin Black documented in his book, “The War Against the Weak,” American “corporate philanthropies helped found and fund the Nazi eugenics of Hitler and Mengele.”

And despite the horrors of Nazi “racial hygiene,” “forced sterilizations of prisoners, theNewsletter_Gen_180x180_B mentally ill and the poor were commonplace in California” and other states until the 1970s, when the practice was finally declared illegal.

Illegal, but apparently not eliminated. It could hardly be otherwise, because the same demonic worldview that fueled earlier efforts remains with us: one that views human dignity as a product of personal productivity. Throw in the anti-natalism, which views children as a burden, not a gift, and the stage is set for what happened in California’s prisons.

It’s the Church’s job to wage war on the demonic worldviews that make outrages like this possible. Three generations of eugenics is three too many.

Further Reading and Information

BP-Takeaction_71513Three Generations of Eugenics: Sterilizing California Prisoners - Next Steps

Eugenicists' belief that some lives are too burdensome has surfaced once again - this time in the California prison system. It is the Church's task to fight against what Eric Metaxas calls this "demonic ideology." We cannot fight effectively against something we don’t entirely understand though. Therefore, read up on the history of eugenics within the United States and what compelled past and current thinkers to take up this ideology.


Articles:

Wir Sprechen Kein Deutsch
Roberto Rivera | BreakPoint.org | July 12, 2013

'Judgment at Nurember' and the Sterilization Debate Today
Ben Booker| BreakPoint| July 12, 2013

Women Inmates Sterilized Without Approval
Pat Nolan | JusticeFellowship.org | July 10, 2013

Better for all the World?
Chuck Colson | BreakPoint.org

Better for all the World?
Chuck Colson | BreakPoint.org

Unfinished Business
Nigel Cameron | BreakPoint.org

Apple-Pie Eugenics
Chuck Colson | BreakPoint.org | October 3, 2003

Deadly Exports
Chuck Colson | BreakPoint.org

Eugenics Redux
Chuck Colson | BreakPoint.org | December 15, 2011

The Fruits of Anti-Natalism
Roberto Rivera | BreakPoint.org | March 6, 2007

Books:

The War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race
Edwin Black | Dialog Press | September 2008

Websites:

Justice Fellowship

Justice Fellowship newsletter sign-up

Other Resources:

Judgment at Nuremburg, movie
Amazon.com

Judgment at Nuremburg, clip
Youtube.com

Buck v. Bell
Supreme Court decision | May 2, 1927

Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States
Lutz Kaelber| University of Vermont|2012


Comments:

supreme court
Thank you for saying, by not saying, that three generations of imbeciles on the "Supreme Court" is enough. There's one thing to remember about the Supreme Court: It's not.