4 Comments

1. Posted by Steve (SBK) on 2009-11-23 11:12:44

   I have no real horse in this race, but it is odd that things like this happen: "But the Associated Press assigned eleven reporters to “fact-check” her book, while doing nothing like that to fact-check then-candidate Obama’s or current Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s no doubt riveting book." - one of the reasons I'm glad I don't have to pay any attention...

2. Posted by Diane Singer on 2009-11-23 09:10:00

   This comment from Jonah Goldberg is priceless: "Indeed, some of us will always be sympathetic to Mrs. Palin if for nothing else than her enemies. The bile she extracts from her critics is almost like a dye marker, illuminating deep pockets of asininity that heretofore were either unnoticed or underappreciated."

3. Posted by jason taylor on 2009-11-21 14:09:12

   What I could never get is why they advertised Obama as an intellectual archetype. To me he reminded me more of a "Boss Tweed's pet"("Hope, Change, Hope, Change, now what in the world does that mean?"). I could get how they managed to advertise Sarah as a Hardy "Jane Wayne" Frontierswoman. I guess what you "get" is what you get.

4. Posted by Alan Eason on 2009-11-21 13:29:20

   That is such a hoot! And people get so blinded they can't even see, as they start reading the comments, that Sarah Palin did not write it. Barak Obama did! Great, great lab on how some people get so blinded by preconceptions and - yes - prejudice - that they cannot see the truth of the matter when it is right under their noses!