Has anyone else noticed the blatant incongruity in President Obamaâ€™s positions when it comes to abortion and torture?
He believes it is fine for a woman to abort her unborn child for any reason and at anytime during the pregnancy. Even if the child initially survives an abortion attempt there should be no attempt to save that child and the doctors will not be held accountable. YET, he finds it totally unacceptable to use waterboarding on a terrorist who may know something about a possible attack on Americans, even if the information obtained could prevent that attack from happening and save many lives.
Irony #1: Abortion always causes the child to die while waterboarding never causes the terrorist to die.
Irony #2: Abortion tears the childâ€™s body apart while waterboarding at most causes the terrorist to swallow water. Ronald Reagan said, â€œThe abortionist who reassembles the arms and legs of a tiny baby to make sure all its parts have been torn from its mother's body can hardly doubt whether it is a human being.â€
Irony #3: The government wants to go after those that have allowed waterboarding and have them prosecuted or disbarred while those that uphold abortion are given positions in President Obamaâ€™s administration.
Irony #4: President Obama calls waterboarding torture, abortion a choice.
Barack Obama condemns the use of torture but isnâ€™t it time for him to recognize that abortion IS torture and condemn it as well?
Jesus said, â€œ'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'" (Matthew 25:40)