BreakPoint Blog

Banner
Banner
What's to Be Done?


"Poor poetry, it is the Darfur of twenty-first century literature. Everyone wants to do something about it, but nobody quite knows what is to be done."

So writes Joseph Epstein in The New Criterion (Sept. 2007). He is lamenting the literary Gresham's Law that has destroyed verse in our lifetime, replacing it with what "seems weightless, without gravity, free-floating, language flying around the joint." Too many poets, too many prizes for nonsense, too many journals that will publish just about anything that doesn't look like real poetry, too few rules. A wasteland.

But in the midst of this wasteland a few oases of real verse continue to refresh those who are willing to wade through the sand to find them, and, mirabile dictu, many of these oases are soundly Christian: the late Denise Levertov and Czeslaw Milosz, the very much alive Richard Wilbur, Wendell Berry, Scott Cairns, Joyce Sutphen, and Dana Gioia. "Poetry can do much, it's true," wrote Milosz, but you have to be willing to search out that which has sufficient gravity and grace to reward the search with lasting images, penetrating insights, and profound sentiments.


Comments:

Well, this is the result much of our post-modern society. There can be no absolute truths, there is only what is right for me. Therefore, why seek to understand a deeper meaning in anything if I am "content" with my own worldview, or worse yet if I am "made uncomfortable" having my own beliefs challenged? Of course poetry is hard to read, even the structure of the sentences, syllables, rhythms, and world choice contribute to the overall meaning of the text. I am reminded of when I read Virgil's the Aneid in its native Latin in college. In English, it is an interesting tale. In Latin, the language of the day comes alive in the page and the reader can almost feel the waves crashing and rocking the ship in the opening pages. Interpreting is a difficult task, and made even more difficult when the author injects intentional errors, misdirection, allegory, and other techniques to force the reader to open up on their assumption of what text means. Poetry challenges us, and when this goes against a society and "conventional wisdom" in a society today where the only correctness is political correctness, persuadable minds are disconnected from truth. Socrates was arrested for "corrupting the minds of the youth" and he would likely argue that all he was doing was asking questions to force people to open up on their assumptions. He himself was a victim of a culture afraid to force their own beliefs much as we seem to be facing today.
T.M. I've spent nearly 25 years trying to get students to appreciate good poetry -- with little success in most cases, I must admit. One of the reasons why poetry has fallen on hard times is because, of all the genres, it requires the most from readers: we must bring our knowledge, experience, understanding, and our willingness to do hard mental and emotional work in order to "get" what a good poem means. Frankly, in our entertainment-driven culture, not that many of us are willing to work at it. The best poems, too, are those that challenge our assumptions about life and force us to take a hard look at ourselves and our society. Again, modern life, with it's "I'm OK, you're OK" mindset resists such soul-altering challenges.
It would be fascinating to have a poetry-reviewing website, like movies have Rotten Tomatoes.