BreakPoint Blog

Banner
Banner
Recovering the Liberal Arts


"And now, O sons, listen to me: blessed are those who keep my ways.  Hear instruction and be wise, and do not neglect it." Proverbs 8:32, 33

That American education is in a crisis is by now so commonplace as to be ho-hum in most circles. Since the 1970s and a flurry of federal and private reports and papers, we've all known that America's schools are falling behind the rest of the world in every category (except sports, of course). Lots of ideas have been vetted -- we seem never to want for new ideas -- but not much in the way of real reform has been achieved.

The schools are working just well enough to keep new blood flowing into the workforce to support those who are entering their golden years. So what's the fuss? Sure most high school graduates can't find Wyoming on a map, have never heard of Bach or Rembrandt, and couldn't construct a grammatically correct sentence if their lives depended on it, but who cares? Unemployment is low, the market is expanding, and there seem to be jobs and goods enough to go around.

That's not good enough for Michael Lind. He wants the schools to recover the focus of previous generations -- long generations ago -- when building character, teaching people how to think, and preparing young people for responsible citizenship were the primary educational aims. And to do that, Mr. Lind wants to see the liberal arts returned to prominence in the secondary school curriculum.

Writing in the Autumn, 2006, issue of The Wilson Quarterly, Mr. Lind expresses the view that the pressures of a utilitarian economy have turned America's schools and colleges into job training centers, with little or no attention being given to the formation of character or preparation for responsible citizenship. Here is where literature, the arts, rhetoric, grammar, and history could help. In the past, communities looked to liberal arts instruction to prepare their children for polite and democratic society. Parents reasoned that making their children adults was more important than making them worker-bees. The jobs would follow when their children learned to think, express themselves, and participate in the public square through dialog and debate. And for this, the liberal arts were the ticket.

The pressures of a rapidly expanding economy swept that away at the end of the 19th century, replacing liberal arts with a utilitarian curriculum, a trend which only grew stronger throughout the 20th century and now, in the early years of the 21st century, seems firmly entrenched. Mr. Lind knows he'll never get the universities to turn back to the liberal arts, so he wants the high schools to take them on instead.


Comments:

The days when such things were taught in Public Schools were the days when there was rough agreement about what was worth learning. Nowadays America is a divided society. You cannot teach such things in a Public School without falling into the danger of teaching an ideology by compulsory education which only a fraction of the American People believe in. Given that, teaching things that do not help make a student capable of surviving and helpful to the common good is questionable. That sort of thing should be left to private school.
I think you (or Mr. Lind or both) are correct in attributing much of the demise of the liberal arts curricula to the utilitarian "reforms" that began in the 19th century and have only gained momentum since. When we recall that the original seven "liberal arts" were essentially the "skills and methods" (artes) that a free man (the root of liberales) would need to assume is responsibilities in society, we should not wonder at the harvest we are now reaping. And when we understand Christ's statement that "the truth shall make [us] free" in the context of Christian discipleship and responsibility, rather than as an enlightenment idol, we begin to see the necessity of truly recovering the Liberal Arts.
That is a reasonable explanation of the results of No Child Left Behind - teachers now teach isolated facts required on the standardized tests, and how to take those tests, with very little left over for anything else that some teachers at least, would -like- to do, towards genuinely educating the children. Textbooks are scripted and curriculum pre-determined. Teachers have been, at least in some places, reduced to mere technicians. Curing that problem alone, however, would solve nothing. It is the view of the teacher's unions, and indoctrinated into teaching students, that the schools are meant to change America. To change the beliefs of the children, that society should be ruled and determined by the schools, and that the teachers are the ones who should make the decisions, because they are more equal than the rest, brighter, more important, etc. I've experienced all of these things. Until -that- is changed, until the drive for what appears to be internationalist Gramscian State-totalism is defeated, any attempt to truly educate children within the public school system, or in any school that is State accredited, is in vain.