BreakPoint Blog

Banner
Banner
Culture Wars: Food Fight Division


Regarding Ben & Jerry's new "Hubby Hubby" flavor and the company's related activism—I am all for freedom of expression. Ben & Jerry’s has long been a supporter of progressive causes and—to their credit—has supported them openly, as opposed to other companies that have funded liberal causes while offering lip service to traditional values in order to appeal to middle America. If they are willing to take a calculated financial risk (albeit only in their own liberal little corner of the Northeast) to stand for a cause they believe in, more power to them.

But one has to ask, what would happen if, say, Breyer’s, were to market a “Proposition 8 Swirl” flavor in California? The wailing and gnashing of teeth would be almost biblical, and the news pundits would fall over each other trying to be the first to condemn it.

I’m not saying such an approach would be advisable, but it is fun to speculate. Is there a double standard amidst the double fudge ripple?


Comments:

Rocky road---for those of us walking the narrow path (which I theologically predict also has rocks...) Also...see second def... Baked Alaska - the cake which is hot on the outside (i.e. baked) but so COOL with still cold ice cream on the inside...this could also be the rocky soil believer who cools off from his/her initial faith. These are just two of the flavors voted "Least Likely to be sold at Ben & Jerry's ... in some Chicago upscale pricy ice cream shop located on the Gold Coast, in the Loop or in Lincoln Park. These Biblically flavored scoops would appeal to the (mostly) lower budget ice cream markets---notably in some of Chicago's south side poverty areas...where they want TRUE flavors!
Poll question: what is your ice cream worldview?
How funny to think that ordering a double vanilla in a waffle cone may one day be code for ... what?! You scream. I scream. We all scream for ice cream.